“Why college athletes should not be paid essay” can make for quite a lengthy essay. College sports are never entirely fair and grant college athletes few rights because they need to pay them. The biggest argument against paying college athletes is that this will take money away from students seeking an education.
A student-athlete at an academic school may have to put in more time and extra effort than a student attending college for the sake of sports. But helping your team by getting outstanding performances on the field does not amount to volunteering, as some colleges might like people to believe it is. Some students find their degree comes first; others worry primarily about making all-conference teams without studying or sacrificing too much on athletics because they want good jobs after graduation.
College athletics is where athletes can focus on their game and fun, not just pass along that knowledge to the next generation. Colleges need money for many students that want another level of education. Some scholars suggest college athletics should be used as an academic study process rather than salaried employees since supposedly these jobs are considered summertime employment while some colleges have many years before graduation.
Why we Shouldn’t Pay to College Athlete
Firstly, if colleges start paying all student-athletes in all games, they may not meet the budget. Without money for the coaches and facilities, there are fewer playing opportunities. Smaller sports that will not meet the budget will hurt the performance of student-athletes, who can get injured in sports where it is necessary to learn tact and technique.
The money given in college tuition and fees does not represent an incentive. To make this argument hold some water, one big factor that could sway how someone chose their career path would be if they were actually at the losing end of a settlement worth millions.
Secondly, individual student-athletes who enter college are already facing the possibility of paying back loans. College is a large financial investment, and a scholarship would represent stealing money from people they might not be able to afford anyway. Only those extremely lucky in how much their relatives give them or even lottery winners will receive scholarships solely due to athletic performance.
Most athletes have far more difficult times after graduation with debt than all other expenses often closely related to sports. In addition, athletics are entirely individual, and student-athletes would receive scholarships for all of their sports equally. While another critique may argue how this could make a program less competitive, athletics departments had done things like this before. The unfathomable numbers back then prove there is no reason they cannot function economically in a similar fashion today.
Thirdly, these institutions feel it “would hurt not just National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) schools but also local high school athletic programs.” And this makes it harder for low-income students to attend school as scholarship athletes. Any student who wishes to play sports doesn’t always have the money available. High school athletes are not obligated by colleges or athletic associations themselves, so there is no reason that people can’t live without sports.
Finally, considering that only 2% of college students become professional athletes, this would mean that college sports only help 2% grow in athletics. Many college athletes play college sports because they want to enjoy the college experience or receive scholarships. Most college athletes do not play sports in college to earn money.
Why Pay College Athletes?
Although the National Collegiate Athletic Association bans all college athletes from receiving direct payments, the college athletics program generate over $18 billion every year. College athletics is a multi-billion dollar industry that attracts huge funds in the name of college scholarships, ticket sales, royalties, etc.
And even though NCAA has many reasons why college athletes should not be paid, I view college athletes as amateur athletes who can grow to be professional sports athletes.
Below are three arguments of why college athletes should be paid.
Argument 1: The Talent Should Share Some of the Profits
The NCAA make billions of dollars every year from student-athlete talent. College athletes often don’t make much of an income because the money schools and colleges make from them doesn’t go to them. NCAA have a strong argument on why college athletes should not be paid. They maximize profits by scholarship length, allowing more profit gain, especially with overtime games. Paid salaries can cut into school’s potential assets instead of providing athletic scholarships because college athletic programs are a very big investment, but they are the big moneymakers.
To support the argument that the talent should receive some of the profits, the National Collegiate Athletic Association should reveal figures of the amount it makes vs the amount that goes to the student-athlete. Analyzing the NCAA spending practices is a strong point in an argumentative essay about “Why pay college athletes?”
Argument 2: College Athletes Do Not Work in Other Jobs
Attending school is not a full-time job, and so does playing sports in college. College athletes should be paid for the time they spend on their sport. The amount of hours athletes are required to play particular sports is just like other full-time jobs.
College students don’t have time for other jobs except playing college sports. Students know that athletics greatly impact their friends and family’s lives. Many student-athletes would raise revenues for an athletic program, which increases the value of intercollegiate sports for young people, making them more likely to watch them. That is why colleges pay student-athletes back salaries because they see it as rewarding work.
College athletes deserve to be paid for their time and not just play for play. Playing sports in college is a lot like having any job on campus. These college athletes often have other responsibilities, such as being responsible for schoolwork that really should be done at home. A college education is the main necessity, so being paid to play sports is extremely important.
Paying athletes to play college sports is the same as paying anyone for any job. The athletes are giving roughly 40-50 per cent of their free time to campus activities and not getting paid in exchange while dealing with meals they need to purchase or other expenses that come with being in school. College athletes should not only chase an athletic scholarship; they should be paid to meet their everyday needs while at their collegiate level.
Argument 3: Only Some College Student-Athletes Should Be Paid
Some people argue that only the college athletes who are big money makers for their institutions and the NCAA should be paid. The more talented who attract more media and endorsements should be paid. A small percentage of student-athletes could be paid to play to these athletes. However, if we aren’t going to pay these most talented individuals who attract attention and fame, what do we get for paying players? College sports are not like professional sports because college athletes are there mostly because they want education first. Then, after all expenses have been paid, should students feel as though they made it?
Certain sports never bring in money to their schools. Unlike popular games like football, they are unpopular and do not bring in any revenue.
Since colleges cannot afford every student-athlete, players who are income-generating should get the cut, e.g. basketball players and football players. Colleges have to choose where the money is spent in both their budgets and save for a rainy day, meaning you may get rid of someone who made your budget. Schools are also not allowed to offer a living stipend as it creates an unfair playing field against people running around with endless resources on college campuses.
And this argument disregards individuality and goals. Being paid will help alleviate other problems universities face, like providing more funding for students and saving up funds.
The Cons: Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid
There are several reasons why college athletes should not be paid. But for a start, let’s look at three cons- why college athletes should not be paid essay example arguments below.
Argument 1: College Athletes are Already Getting Paid
While we are campaigning that collegiate athletes be paid, they receive money and pay for play in terms of free tuition and additional funding to cover some of their college education expenses like books and fees. And this is a strong argument for why college athletes should not be paid essay.
Since direct payments do not exist, the money comes in benefits and athletic scholarships.
Some sporting events have more money and offer full scholarships—the average student graduates with an estimated $30.000 student loan for a four-year college degree. An athletic scholarship will come in handy in making education affordable.
Looking at the financial support received by other students and student-athletes can help confirm this argument. And this argument confirms that student-athletes are compensated in both financial ways and non-financial benefits. So many benefits are already paid to collegiate athletes, so paying them would only increase the demand for more.
Argument 2: Paying College Athletes Would Side-Step the Real Problem
College-level athletics are not professional sports and should not be treated like one just to be exploited. And this is another argument for why college athletes should not be paid essay.
The current college sporting system should be reimagined. And NCAA athletes receiving payments is not a solution either.
A good solution is to create a student-athlete minor league where college athletes who want to be professional athletes get paid while not subjecting the budget to all college students. And this model allows student-athletes to continue attending college while paying them while they still get the courses that help their résumé or have a chance to go pro in whichever future sport’s athlete.
The argument suggests that athletics are internal in an institution but not operating with a purpose other than extra-curricular activities. College athletes can focus on education and their talents through the minor leagues.
Argument 3: It Would Create a Logistical Nightmare
And this argument supports why college athletes should not be paid essay since it will create a logistics nightmare. And this logistical nightmare cannot be solved by simply paying them. Paying athletes would split minds on exactly how to calculate the money given and who is responsible for what.
The problem here lies in determining where talent ends, and athletic success begins, especially when so many of these students have reached their professional careers with lower-than-expected earnings after graduation, considering that they still probably owe a good portion of their debt from college.
Thus, creating a “pay for play” notion where college athletes receive equal stipends from playing college athletes could solve the problem, But this solution creates many questions” Who will finance the budget? How will you pay players of some games and leave the rest? How to avoid violating Title IX?
Thus paying college student-athletes will be more problematic than it sounds and possibly more complicated than expected.
Such questions will reveal to the reader of your essay that it’s too problematic to pay student-athletes and convince them why college athletes should not be paid.
The Role of a student-athlete and the need for them to be Paid
From our why college athletes should not be paid essay arguments above, a student-athlete is supposed to be a student and a young athlete at the same time. This dualism of roles helps him learn life skills, especially how to keep a level head amid social pressure. The college experience provides these students with an education. Still, it’s also supposed to prepare them for the real world outside their privileged community, where they might need more than intelligence alone.
Student-athletes should be paid since the colleges make so much money from their talent. Teaming up with universities in this pay for play system will encourage athletes to be great students and hopefully make them much more successful than if they weren’t paid.
In an attempt to attract the best high-level athletes, student-athletes should always be viewed as highly intelligent young adults but not necessarily talented or super-athletic people who have succeeded without working hard at school. The general idea is that a student-athlete must work very hard at academics and sports.
Have Doubts About How to Write your Paper Correctly?
Are you having trouble writing why college athletes should not be paid essay or any other essay? Contact galaxygrades.com, a premium online essay writing service that can provide you with quality augmentative essay papers on demand. We have staffed professionals to make your life easier.
Our writers are professional academic experts in oral presentation design, research papers and essay writing with accredited curricula.
Click here to order now – and receive your order fast! Get better grades with galaxygrades.com!